Showing posts with label soul. Show all posts
Showing posts with label soul. Show all posts
Monday, December 8, 2014
Why write? Why art?: Metaphor
Why write? Why art?: Metaphor
Why do we write? Why do we create art? Why do I write on this blog? I suppose an argument could be made for it being a waste of time, but this is one of the reasons why it isn’t.
Metaphor.
From Wallace Stevens’ “The Motive for Metaphor”
“The obscure moon lighting an obscure world
Of things that would never be quite expressed,
Where you yourself were never quite yourself
And did not want nor have to be,
Desiring the exhilirations of changes:
the motive for metaphor”
The mental act of metaphor changes the subject and the writer. It expresses something that will never be fully and satisfyingly expressed, and once exposed to or having created a good metaphor a person is forever changed.
For example, in Moby Dick Melville compares the soul, or the inner man, or an inner need inside of us, to a miner. The quote deserves to be placed here again: “The subterranean miner that works in us all, how can one tell whither leads his shaft by the ever shifting muffled sound of his pick? Who does not feel the irresistible arm drag?” - Melville. Reading Moby Dick changed me in several ways. To get the full effect of the quote it is necessary, I believe, to read the book, but ever since I read that (it took the second read for it to really sink in) I’ve had an image of a miner digging through the mine shaft of my soul. Sometimes I think I can even hear that muffled pick chipping away at the rock.
But still, why? The above almost sounds horrifying, but the soul is an idea that we will never fully express or understand. This metaphor has given me a place to start. The most amazing thing is that this metaphor combined with a D.H. Lawrence metaphor about a soul being a pile of unlit tinder. My understanding of the soul grows the more metaphors I discover.
I will add another, happier, metaphor here. After I wrote about the following poem I added another reason for writing and art: happiness.
“Of Mere Being”
Wallace Stevens
The palm at the end of the mind,
Beyind the last thought, rises
In the bronze decor,
A gold-feathered bird
Sings in the palm, without human meaning,
Without human feeling, a foreign song.
You know then that it is not the reason
That makes us happy or unhappy.
The bird sings. Its feathers shine.
The palm stands on the edge of space.
The wind moves slowly in the branches.
The bird’s fire-fangled feathers dangle down.
According to me and some others, the bird is the imagination. The imagination is beyond the mind, beyond reason, something we cannot control, something free and beautiful and singing. Happiness comes not from reason, but from our imaginations. Happiness comes from art.
Labels:
Herman Melville,
melville,
metaphor,
soul,
wallace stevens,
why art,
why write
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
Shakespeare, p.1, All the world's a stage, or Emotion is of the Heart, Mind, and Soul
"All the world's a stage,/and the men and women merely players"
Does this mean that we are all merely playing at life? Is Shakespeare saying that we aren't really living, but acting out emotions?
Maybe only some people do this. It seems that some react to life based on emotion. Avoiding unpleasant things because it makes them feel bad, or pursuing pleasure for the sake of feeling good. For instance, a guy not asking a girl out because he is afraid of rejection, or having sex as often as possible for the pleasure. Is that really living through emotion though?
In the case of a guy not asking a girl out it is clear that he is forsaking something possibly great for the feeling of comfort and stability. Instead of pursuing something, he is doing nothing. Is that living based on emotion?
Someone who has sex for pleasure is pursuing a pleasurable feeling, but not the possibly greater feeling of being truly close to someone. So, emotion is separate from sensory pleasure.
Emotion comes from emovere, which is Latin for out (ex) move (movere). Emotion is outward movement, but from where?
Is emotion more than a mental and physical process then? It can, of course, be tracked and measured in the brain, but that only answers how emotion exists. Not why. Is emotion more than just feeling good, or feeling sad, or feeling angry, or feeling at all? Maybe emotion goes beyond even the mind, and comes also from the soul.
So, does emotion come from God?
Does this mean that we are all merely playing at life? Is Shakespeare saying that we aren't really living, but acting out emotions?
Maybe only some people do this. It seems that some react to life based on emotion. Avoiding unpleasant things because it makes them feel bad, or pursuing pleasure for the sake of feeling good. For instance, a guy not asking a girl out because he is afraid of rejection, or having sex as often as possible for the pleasure. Is that really living through emotion though?
In the case of a guy not asking a girl out it is clear that he is forsaking something possibly great for the feeling of comfort and stability. Instead of pursuing something, he is doing nothing. Is that living based on emotion?
Someone who has sex for pleasure is pursuing a pleasurable feeling, but not the possibly greater feeling of being truly close to someone. So, emotion is separate from sensory pleasure.
Emotion comes from emovere, which is Latin for out (ex) move (movere). Emotion is outward movement, but from where?
Is emotion more than a mental and physical process then? It can, of course, be tracked and measured in the brain, but that only answers how emotion exists. Not why. Is emotion more than just feeling good, or feeling sad, or feeling angry, or feeling at all? Maybe emotion goes beyond even the mind, and comes also from the soul.
So, does emotion come from God?
Labels:
all the world's a stage,
emotion,
heart,
mind,
p.1,
playing,
Shakespeare,
soul
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
